Thomas hobbes nature of man

8.81  ·  8,091 ratings  ·  398 reviews
thomas hobbes nature of man

Leviathan Quotes by Thomas Hobbes

File Name: thomas hobbes nature of
Size: 75215 Kb
Published 26.11.2018

"Leviathan" by Thomas Hobbes

The pure state of nature, or "the natural condition of mankind", was described by the 17th century English philosopher Thomas.

State of nature

Monarchy vs Democracy Through assessing both monarchy and democracy from both perspectives of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, one can see that democracy creates the most beneficial outcome. Hobbes had a pessimistic view of people. He believed humans were selfish, doing anything to further their own position in life. Hobbes believed in an absolute monarchy, a government that gave all the power to a king or queen. Even though he distrusted democracy, he believed that a diverse group of representatives. Today, many people associate the ideals Locke adopts with democracy.

State of nature , in political theory, the real or hypothetical condition of human beings before or without political association. Many social-contract theorists, such as Thomas Hobbes and John Locke , relied on this notion to examine the limits and justification of political authority or even, as in the case of Jean-Jacques Rousseau , the legitimacy of human society itself. Visions of the state of nature differ sharply between theorists, although most associate it with the absence of state sovereignty. What Hobbes calls the first law of nature , for instance, is. In the absence of a higher authority to adjudicate disputes, everyone fears and mistrusts everyone else, and there can be no justice , commerce, or culture.

Academic Tools

The state of nature is a concept used in moral and political philosophy , religion , social contract theories and international law [1] to denote the hypothetical conditions of what the lives of people might have been like before societies came into existence. Philosophers of the state of nature theory deduce that there must have been a time before organized societies existed, and this presumption thus raises questions such as: "What was life like before civil society?

Hobbes Life and Works. Human Nature. His Leviathan effectively developed a vocabulary for philosophy in the English language by using Anglicized versions of the technical terms employed by Greek and Latin authors. Careful use of words to signify common ideas in the mind, Hobbes maintained, avoids the difficulties to which human reasoning is most obviously prone and makes it possible to articulate a clear conception of reality. Leviathan I 4 For Hobbes, that conception is bound to be a mechanistic one: the movements of physical objects will turn out to be sufficient to explain everything in the universe. The chief purpose of scientific investigation, then, is to develop a geometrical account of the motion of bodies, which will reveal the genuine basis of their causal interactions and the regularity of the natural world. Thus, Hobbes defended a strictly materialist view of the world.

One reason for these different conclusions lies in their opposing understanding of human nature, with, in the most crude sense, Hobbes seeing man as a creature of desire and Locke as one of reason. A second explanation for their conclusions is their understanding of the nature of rights. Locke saw certain rights as independent of government or the state, whereas Hobbes, in a sense, saw them as coming from the state. This position of Hobbes is arrived at in a systematic way that perhaps makes him the father of political science. In terms of human agency Hobbes viewed motion as producing delight or displeasure within us. Obviously we will desire those pleasure or delight inducing motions rather than painful or even contemptible ones and so are in a fixed search for felicity and aversion to pain.

The 17 th Century English philosopher Thomas Hobbes is now widely regarded as one of a handful of truly great political philosophers, whose masterwork Leviathan rivals in significance the political writings of Plato, Aristotle, Locke, Rousseau, Kant, and Rawls. He is infamous for having used the social contract method to arrive at the astonishing conclusion that we ought to submit to the authority of an absolute—undivided and unlimited—sovereign power. While his methodological innovation had a profound constructive impact on subsequent work in political philosophy, his substantive conclusions have served mostly as a foil for the development of more palatable philosophical positions. Readers new to Hobbes should begin with Leviathan , being sure to read Parts Three and Four, as well as the more familiar and often excerpted Parts One and Two. Hobbes sought to discover rational principles for the construction of a civil polity that would not be subject to destruction from within. Continued stability will require that they also refrain from the sorts of actions that might undermine such a regime. For example, subjects should not dispute the sovereign power and under no circumstances should they rebel.


  1. Pattojnr says:

    Monarchy Vs. Democracy By Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

  2. Scantarares says:

    Thomas Hobbes: A grim portrait of human nature

  3. Vawinviebat says:

    An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

  4. Dominic N. says:

    For Hobbes political authority is artificial: in the "natural" condition human beings lack government.

  5. Marlon M. says:

    The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes is best known for his political thought, and deservedly so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *